The concept of original sin is Abrahamic is nature. I have to ask why you are so afraid to proudly state your beliefs. Let me guess, it is easier for you to argue behind a veil of secrecy?

Anyways, the concept of original sin has been completely invalidated by science. You might as well tell me the earth is 6000 years old while you are at it.

I may have falsely equated you as a follower of an Abrahamic religion (there are many) but that is only because you represented yourself as such. You did so again even after responding to my posts with this quote above by expressing your belief in original sin.

Note, I didn't mention Jesus in that wall of text you quoted either, so I not sure why you brought him back into the conversation other than you making the incorrect assumption that I am assuming you were Christian. You very obviously express some Christian values and express some Abrahamic based beliefs. Whether or not you identify with any religion or not is irrelevant to my comments and that is what you fail to see in entirety.

I don't care what your beliefs are. What I do care about is a specific set of religious beliefs giving preferential treatments through state sponsorship. What I do care about is religious ideology influencing government policy in a negative way.

I learned long ago that participation in, or even reading threads like this is a pointless, futile waste of otherwise productive time.

But just to pick nits, statements like that quoted above strike me as overstepping their bounds.

If "science" has no data point to represent a "God/god/deity" as an action-causing entity, and "sin" is generally referred to as something that violates the law of said supreme deity, then... is the concept of sin even germane to science?

Granted, you didn't say, "completely disproven," or "completely proven false," but you also could have said, "declared irrelevant to physical science" or something along those lines.

Just wondering if you wanted to clarify, defend, or cite references for the original statement.