Hang 10... or as they now say...hit the lip!

2nd Light Forums
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Bad news for progs, but good news for the country.
Topic Summary:
Created On: 02/11/2019 11:00 AM
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 02/11/2019 11:00 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 29274
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Optimism on fersonal finances at a 16 year high.

-------------------------
I :heart; Putin

 02/11/2019 11:05 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RustyTruck

Posts: 19667
Joined Forum: 08/02/2004

You guys like polls now?

-------------------------
…for beauty is nothing
but the beginning of terror,
which we can just barely endure,
and we stand in awe of it as it coolly disdains to destroy us. Every angel is terrifying.
 02/11/2019 12:19 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


wtf

Posts: 3211
Joined Forum: 11/23/2005

Daily mail, LMFAO, yup the circus continues. Meanwhile the REAL pools have it at 40%. More #fakenews from the dotards...

-------------------------
trump - putting the 'con' in conservative
 02/11/2019 12:23 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


fishkller

Posts: 3405
Joined Forum: 11/13/2016


Since Pattycakes The Clown is always wrong, and believes the most "rediculous" (c) FK89 of sources..

The approval rating is probably more like 35-40 percent.. or worse

Basically, just a bunch of clowns left in that Trump circus..

-------------------------
 02/11/2019 01:57 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Greensleeves

Posts: 11195
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Tspank's source is garbage and they prove themselves to be:

"The president is citing a poll from @Rasmussen_Poll, which said that Republicans would win the popular vote for the U.S. House," said FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver, who once described Rasmussen as "biased." "Instead, Democrats won it by 9 points."

Further and as Cole pointed out recently they Rasmussen relies on landlines with an attempt to reach those not crippled with debilitating age related dementia by doing a bit of on-line polling.

Like Tspank the Rasmussen polling is broke down and depleted.

-------------------------
 02/11/2019 02:11 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 29274
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Just thought you progs would like to know. I am sure that, given progs history of being right about everything, your take on Rassmussen is correct and that he is an incompetent weasel. Trump couldn't possibly be approved by more than .01%, which is the percentage of white supremacists out there. Smooth sailing in 2020. Hell, you won't even have to vote.

-------------------------
I :heart; Putin

 02/11/2019 02:26 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


fishkller

Posts: 3405
Joined Forum: 11/13/2016


^^^

(Cue circus music)

Baaaaaa doot doot

Bada Bada doot doot....

-------------------------
 02/11/2019 03:50 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 38261
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

No, it isn't.

http://projects.fivethirtyeigh...tings/?ex_cid=rrpromo

Rasmussen is on crack.

-------------------------
Dave doesn't like me.
 02/11/2019 04:11 PM
User is online View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 41253
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Fivethirtyeight....predicted Killary for POTUS... in a landslide.

I'll stick with Rasmussen.

Much more accurate even though they arent as good as they should be.

-------------------------
 02/11/2019 04:15 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


fishkller

Posts: 3405
Joined Forum: 11/13/2016

Originally posted by: Fish Killer

Fivethirtyeight....predicted Killary for POTUS... in a landslide.




Except they didn't really. If you had bothered to look near the day of the election- you'd see that their numbers were changing rapidly..

They had Hillary to win leading up to near-election, as did pretty much all of them - but then things starting changing post Comey.

So you can put your MAGA hillbilly boner away LOL

-------------------------
 02/11/2019 04:23 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 29274
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Yeah it did, under their system. Gave Clinton a 70+% chance of winning. And, actually, it had her chances increasing the week before the election.

-------------------------
I :heart; Putin

 02/11/2019 07:04 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


fishkller

Posts: 3405
Joined Forum: 11/13/2016


Nobody's talking about the week before Pattycakes.. go back and reread.. you must have makeup in your eyes LOL

-------------------------
 02/12/2019 01:19 AM
User is online View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 41253
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Originally posted by: fishkller

Originally posted by: Fish Killer



Fivethirtyeight....predicted Killary for POTUS... in a landslide.









Except they didn't really. If you had bothered to look near the day of the election- you'd see that their numbers were changing rapidly..



They had Hillary to win leading up to near-election, as did pretty much all of them - but then things starting changing post Comey.



So you can put your MAGA hillbilly boner away LOL


Yes in fact they did.

Just because they attempted to look like they weren't so TAINTED that they HAD to alter their data more in lines with REALITY at the very LAST moment....in NO way removes the loaded BULLSHIT DATA that they spewed for MONTHS before the election to make people THINK that Hillary was a SURE THING and 'yall should just vote for her cause she's going to win anyway!!!'

GET FUCKING REAL.....

It's a PLOY by your favorite BULLSHIT Polling company to ALTER VOTES!!!

It just so happened to FAIL!

Comey couldn't alter THAT MANY VOTES on his BEST DAY!

Furthermore he couldn't alter ANY republican votes as republicans dont vote for the likes of a POS like Hillary!

Your 'Comey' theory is a LOAD of CRAP!

FAIL!



-------------------------
 02/12/2019 04:40 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 38261
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

The number on that page is an average. Rasmussen is eight points higher than the next in line. Rasmussen is a bunch of elderly who are happy with the bipartisan flavor to his speech, which we now know was a ruse. His lies in el Paso will knock him back down to his deserved level of low 40's.

-------------------------
Dave doesn't like me.

Edited: 02/12/2019 at 04:41 AM by Cole
 02/12/2019 05:12 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


wtf

Posts: 3211
Joined Forum: 11/23/2005

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Yeah it did, under their system. Gave Clinton a 70+% chance of winning. And, actually, it had her chances increasing the week before the election.

Which means trump would win 3/10 times. Even if she was at 90%, it still does not mean she would win every time. I know that's hard for you math challenged dotards to comprehend, you know it is numbers and all which you have proven you are not good at.


-------------------------
trump - putting the 'con' in conservative
 02/12/2019 07:23 PM
User is online View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 41253
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Originally posted by: wtf

Originally posted by: tpapablo



Yeah it did, under their system. Gave Clinton a 70+% chance of winning. And, actually, it had her chances increasing the week before the election.


Which means trump would win 3/10 times. Even if she was at 90%, it still does not mean she would win every time. I know that's hard for you math challenged dotards to comprehend, you know it is numbers and all which you have proven you are not good at.


Yeah...but she FUCKING LOST!

SHITFORBRAINS!

-------------------------
Statistics
145869 users are registered to the 2nd Light Forums forum.
There are currently 1 users logged in to the forum.

FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2019 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

Hey Matt B ... How the hell o are you ??? :)