Hey Matt B ... How the hell o are you ??? :)

2nd Light Forums
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: "I think I'd take it"
Topic Summary:
Created On: 06/12/2019 03:55 PM
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
<< 1 2 3 4 5 Previous Next Last unread
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 06/13/2019 06:51 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: Greensleeves tspank's vicodin working this morning Trump is slime
Even on vicodin I can make fools of progs, Clayton. Like Rush says, I can do it with half my brain tied behind my back. Now, if you guys can post your condemnations of and outrage over Hillary paying foreigner to get her the Steele Dossier, I will apologize to you dopes.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 06:59 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


3rdworldlover

Posts: 22493
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Alright! Another prog freak out over nothing.

Let's say Trump paid a foreigner - a Brit, say - to approach and pay Russian officials for dirt on his opponent, would that be wrong?

Hypocritical idiots.


Steele was a Brittish intelligence agent that worked for decades protecting the USA and our NATO allies from Russia, using his sources within Russia. His report was delivered to the FBI. That's exactly the opposite of what the Trump campaign did with the help Russia provided to them, and Russia sure is collecting on that deal.
 06/13/2019 07:23 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: 3rdworldlover
Originally posted by: tpapablo Alright! Another prog freak out over nothing. Let's say Trump paid a foreigner - a Brit, say - to approach and pay Russian officials for dirt on his opponent, would that be wrong? Hypocritical idiots.
Steele was a Brittish intelligence agent that worked for decades protecting the USA and our NATO allies from Russia, using his sources within Russia. His report was delivered to the FBI. That's exactly the opposite of what the Trump campaign did with the help Russia provided to them, and Russia sure is collecting on that deal.
He was a foreigner, correct? And he passed on dirt from a foreign gov't, right? And Hillary accepted it. She passed it on to the FBI and the press so that it would get out and be used against Trump in the campaign, which it was. You can lie to yourself, but not to normal Americans.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 07:38 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Greensleeves

Posts: 20478
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.

"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"

His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)
 06/13/2019 07:38 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


jdbman

Posts: 12159
Joined Forum: 07/28/2003

Consider reading: Washington's farewell address and The Federalist Papers by Hamilton.

If the trumpist read these docs and the constitution like they claim to read the bible, things might be a little different.

-------------------------
So if you are a surfer I wish you the prosperity that allows you more time to pursue the salt water dream, and the true happiness that comes from warm water, clean waves and the companionship of your fellow surfers. If you are an internet troll just spewing bs then f off.
 06/13/2019 07:44 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


3rdworldlover

Posts: 22493
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003


Paying a trusted ally for opposition research that revealed a conspiracy to disrupt a US election is the same as arranging to accept from a hostile foreign nation, the strategically timed release of stolen/hacked information in exchange for foreign policy favors putting US interests below Russia's?
 06/13/2019 07:48 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


scombrid

Posts: 18018
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Originally posted by: KeyserSoze He SHOULD listen - - - - then decide the proper course of action!
And his chosen course of action:
I'll tell you what, I've seen a lot of things over my life. I don't think in my whole life I've ever called the FBI. In my whole life. You don't call the FBI.


-------------------------
...



Edited: 06/13/2019 at 07:49 AM by scombrid
 06/13/2019 07:50 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RustyTruck

Posts: 33293
Joined Forum: 08/02/2004

Originally posted by: Greensleeves

tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.



"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"



His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)


His periods of lucidity are getting more infrequent I'm afraid. It's a shame, the guy does have a decent sense of humor.

-------------------------
Capitalism is based on the ridiculous notion that you can enjoy limitless growth in a closed, finite system.

In biology, such behavior of cells is called "cancer".
 06/13/2019 07:52 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: Greensleeves

tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.



"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"



His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)


The problem is she didn't do it. Researching is different than being approached by foreign agents and taking what they have. I thought you were a lawyer Tpap. Oh yeah, that is BS.
 06/13/2019 08:01 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Greensleeves

Posts: 20478
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Agreed Hap but for the sake of brevity I didn't go into "and they use the filth from their GOP misinformation masters to argue which are lies/misdirections in the first place"
 06/13/2019 08:04 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


3rdworldlover

Posts: 22493
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

David Frum,

"As the president plunges into a sea of what-aboutism, pulling Fox News talking heads after him, let's recall what it is actually about a crime was committed, a very serious crime: a computer hack. It's no less a burglary for stealing digital rather than physical property. Same crime as Watergate. (2)
All the way back in the summer of 2016, everybody knew who committed this crime: Russian military intelligence. Claims that maybe it was an "inside job" etc. were floated in bad faith by untruthful people - but everybody knew, the Trump campaign very much included. (3)
When Donald Trump Jr. accepted his famous Trump Tower meeting, he was hoping to receive the proceeds of a crime. He was disappointed in that hope, but that's what he hoped. (4)
And when the proceeds of the crime did begin to be posted on the WikiLeaks site later in the summer of 2016 and -devastatingly - less than 1 hour after the reporting of the "Access Hollywood" tape in October 2016, everybody understand that this was Putin acting to help Trump (5)
None of this bears any resemblance to "oppo research" - information obtained lawfully by asking questions, reading archives, etc. It was crime, no less criminal for being outsourced to foreigners beyond the reach of US prosectors (6)
The Mueller report found insufficient evidence to convict anyone on the Trump campaign of culpability in the crime. But it stressed: the crime was committed by Russian military intelligence to help Trump, and the Trump campaign knowingly welcomed that help (7)
If the Trump campaign had flown a private investigator to Moscow to interview people about the (bogus) Uranium One Clinton story ... nobody would object. That is oppo research. If they trawled old Arkansas police records in search of something discrediting ... again, research (8)
What fellow Republicans first and then Democrats later hired Christopher Steele to do - interview people, collect rumors, sift through them - falls into this former category. The quality of Steele's work you can dispute. He committed no crimes in course of doing it. (9)
Trump Jr's visitors in June 2016 purported to deliver - and Trump's actual helpers later in the year did actually deliver - the proceeds of crimes. In full light of day, and with Trump on video urging them onward. (10)
The Trump campaign was absolved of criminal culpability by Mueller in large part on issue o intent. Did they truly understand they were being invited to participate in a crime? Did they truly wish to participate? And could that be proven beyond reasonable doubt? (11)
That's why President Trump's words to ABC were so important. He was asked, now that you have full knowledge of all that was at issue - including the crime committed by the Putin regime by hacking Americans - would you receive that information again? Trump answered YES. (12)
Trump confessed the thing Mueller could not prove. (END
 06/13/2019 08:11 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: HAPDigital
Originally posted by: Greensleeves tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing. "Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it" His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)
The problem is she didn't do it. Researching is different than being approached by foreign agents and taking what they have. I thought you were a lawyer Tpap. Oh yeah, that is BS.
Agreed Hap but for the sake of brevity I didn't go into "and they use the filth from their GOP misinformation masters to argue which are lies/misdirections in the first place"
Ah. So it is wrong if someone comes to you, but perfectly fine if you go to them? So you guys would be cool with Trump going to Putin and asking him to provide any dirt that he has on Biden? Like I said, you guys are making fools out of yourselves, again.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 08:20 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: Greensleeves



tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.







"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"







His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)




The problem is she didn't do it. Researching is different than being approached by foreign agents and taking what they have. I thought you were a lawyer Tpap. Oh yeah, that is BS.


Agreed Hap but for the sake of brevity I didn't go into "and they use the filth from their GOP misinformation masters to argue which are lies/misdirections in the first place"


Ah. So it is wrong if someone comes to you, but perfectly fine if you go to them? So you guys would be cool with Trump going to Putin and asking him to provide any dirt that he has on Biden? Like I said, you guys are making fools out of yourselves, again.


Hillary never went to a foreign agency for dirt. You still don't have your facts straight. A big part of the problem is that Trump supporters are ill-informed.

Edited: 06/13/2019 at 08:25 AM by HAPDigital
 06/13/2019 09:41 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


scombrid

Posts: 18018
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.

-------------------------
...

 06/13/2019 10:30 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: scombrid Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.
Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 10:37 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: scombrid

Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.


Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.


So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.
 06/13/2019 10:47 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Pagerow

Posts: 5608
Joined Forum: 12/22/2005

Originally posted by: 3rdworldlover


That's why President Trump's words to ABC were so important. He was asked, "Now that you have full knowledge of all that was at issue, including the crime committed by the Putin regime by hacking Americans, would you receive that information again? Trump answered "YES." (12)

Trump confessed the thing Mueller could not prove.


^^Exactly!!^^

Ya'll Drumpf-ists keep following this blundering D-bag, and you are showing what lemmings you really are.

-------------------------
GOP:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project
 06/13/2019 10:49 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: Pagerow

Originally posted by: 3rdworldlover





That's why President Trump's words to ABC were so important. He was asked, "Now that you have full knowledge of all that was at issue, including the crime committed by the Putin regime by hacking Americans, would you receive that information again? Trump answered "YES." (12)



Trump confessed the thing Mueller could not prove.




^^Exactly!!^^



Ya'll Drumpf-ists keep following this blundering D-bag, and you are showing what lemmings you really are.


They like it because "it makes progs angry". It's all they got. They contribute absolutely nothing to our country, nothing. They're just trolls and they love a big orange troll in the White House.
 06/13/2019 10:49 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: HAPDigital
Originally posted by: tpapablo
Originally posted by: scombrid Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.
Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.
So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.
Nooo. That breaks no law and doesn't even come close. You, Hap, better stick to being a bum. You don't have much of a future in the law business.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 10:55 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: tpapablo



Originally posted by: scombrid



Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.




Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.




So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.



Nooo. That breaks no law and doesn't even come close. You, Hap, better stick to being a bum. You don't have much of a future in the law business.


Eh yes it does. I have more of a chance at law than you, I am sure....

52 U.S. Code ยง 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

Get back at me when you get something right for once. You are batting a big goose egg.

I suggest you stick to living off your parents' money.

Edited: 06/13/2019 at 10:58 AM by HAPDigital
FORUMS : National Enquirer (FORMERLY NSR) : "I think I'd take it"

<< 1 2 3 4 5 Previous Next Last unread
Topic Tools Topic Tools
Statistics
146494 users are registered to the 2nd Light Forums forum.
There are currently 0 users logged in to the forum.

FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2024 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

First there was Air Jordan .