06/06/2014 11:42 AM
|
tpapablo
Posts: 45230
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003
|
As I said ....
As many a prog can tell you, there is no future in arguing with me. You'll only make yourself look foolish. I have banished more progs from this forum than you can count (or, if you are a prog in Republican clothing, much more than you can count), due to my exposing them as abject dunces. You'd do well to learn from their humiliation.
-------------------------
I :heart; Q
|
|
|
06/06/2014 11:46 AM
|
Cole
Posts: 70087
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003
|
Tpap. I know you aren't dumb enough to believe that Scott spent $70 million of his own money for the betterment of the state?
He'll turn that $70 into $170.... why do you think he hides behind the Blind Trusts?
-------------------------
I was right.
|
|
|
06/06/2014 12:06 PM
|
tpapablo
Posts: 45230
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003
|
Almost all politicians of a certain stature put their assets into a blind trust, including the PiC. As much as I despise the PiC and question his motives, I haven't for one second thought that he wanted to become president to enrich himself.
You are certainly entitled to believe what you want. But, I am going to stick to the facts. And the fact is that there is no evidence suggesting that Scott is using the office to enrich himself.
-------------------------
I :heart; Q
|
|
|
06/06/2014 12:09 PM
|
Cole
Posts: 70087
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003
|
Scott is a know criminal, there is absolutely no reason to believe he has changed.
Kick-backs are profitable, especially in the long run.
-------------------------
I was right.
|
|
|
06/06/2014 02:19 PM
|
3rdworldlover
Posts: 22805
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003
|
Originally posted by: tpapablo
Almost all politicians of a certain stature put their assets into a blind trust, including the PiC. As much as I despise the PiC and question his motives, I haven't for one second thought that he wanted to become president to enrich himself.
You are certainly entitled to believe what you want. But, I am going to stick to the facts. And the fact is that there is no evidence suggesting that Scott is using the office to enrich himself.
1. Obama does not have a blind trust, and disclosed all of his financial info as public record.
2. Rick Scott wrote a law to hide his investments, included it as a rider on an ethics bill. That's all the evidence needed to know he cannot be trusted to represent the interests of Floridians.
|
|
|
06/06/2014 12:10 PM
|
surf4fun
Posts: 1706
Joined Forum: 06/23/2004
|
The only one who is a fool is you Tpab. You ignore everything negative about Rick Scott yet you have the audacity to call the rest of us foolish?
The jury of 2ndlight does not agree with your foolish reasoning.
Edited: 06/06/2014 at 02:28 PM by surf4fun
|
|
|
06/06/2014 12:45 PM
|
tpapablo
Posts: 45230
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003
|
Originally posted by: surf4fun The only one who is a fool is you Tpab. You ignore everything negative about Rick Scott yet you have the audacity to cool the rest of us foolish?
The jury of 2ndlight does not agree with your foolish reasoning.
Well the 2nd Light jury is waiting for you to post the links that validate your unsubtantiated contentions. Tick, tock, tick tock ....
Scott is a know criminal, there is absolutely no reason to believe he has changed.
Ah, Cole, you have taken up the challenge. Please post links that set out Scott's convictions. Also, post some links showing that Scott is still at it.
I see that you hold the belief that a criminal can never be reformed. So, I suppose that the PiC is still a coke head. That still doesn't explain his incompetency.
-------------------------
I :heart; Q
|
|
|
06/06/2014 12:51 PM
|
surf4fun
Posts: 1706
Joined Forum: 06/23/2004
|
There is plenty of information in this thread alone. It is futile with you. No evidence will change your mind. You will support any clown with an R next to his name.
If you just spent a fraction of the time researching Rick Scott as you do obsessing over Obama then maybe you would be able to see the light.
You maybe a successful lawyer, but you are dense and closed minded. The fact you have to resort to name calling when someone calls you out on your BS just shows how you lack the ability to think critically.
|
|
|
06/06/2014 02:29 PM
|
surf4fun
Posts: 1706
Joined Forum: 06/23/2004
|
Originally posted by: tpapablo
I see that you hold the belief that a criminal can never be reformed.
At least you can admit that Rick Scott is a criminal.
|
|
|
06/06/2014 02:43 PM
|
Cole
Posts: 70087
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003
|
Scott used the fifth 75 times and his company was fined over two billion dollars for fraud that occurred when he was in charge. Civil court saw him as guilty and he kept his mouth shout to keep the criminal court from doing the same.
Sorry barrister, but the ball is in your court.
If he had a D in front of his name, you would be all over him and your actions would be justified.
-------------------------
I was right.
|
|
|
06/06/2014 02:47 PM
|
tpapablo
Posts: 45230
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003
|
1. Obama does not have a blind trust, and disclosed all of his financial info as public record.
He did at one time.
-------------------------
I :heart; Q
|
|
|
06/06/2014 02:51 PM
|
tpapablo
Posts: 45230
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003
|
... but you are dense and closed minded. The fact you have to resort to name calling when someone calls you out on your BS just shows how you lack the ability to think critically.
Unbelievable. You progs are some kind of dumb.
-------------------------
I :heart; Q
|
|
|
06/06/2014 03:14 PM
|
surf4fun
Posts: 1706
Joined Forum: 06/23/2004
|
Originally posted by: tpapablo
... but you are dense and closed minded. The fact you have to resort to name calling when someone calls you out on your BS just shows how you lack the ability to think critically.
Unbelievable. You progs are some kind of dumb.
I am a registered republican. Back to name calling when the 2ndlight jury shows your ignorance and favoritism for Mr. Scott. Is that how you win your court cases, by name calling?
*to be crystal clear, by name calling in this post I am referring to the term prog*
|
|
|
06/08/2014 02:54 PM
|
surf4fun
Posts: 1706
Joined Forum: 06/23/2004
|
Tpab, have you been ignoring this thread now?
|
|
|
06/08/2014 03:14 PM
|
tpapablo
Posts: 45230
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003
|
No, I am carfefully monitoring this thread. I have, in fact, devoted my life to it.
I use name calling in trials, though very subtly. But I primarily win by making logical and persuasive arguments, like I do on this forum.
-------------------------
I :heart; Q
|
|
|
06/08/2014 03:26 PM
|
surf4fun
Posts: 1706
Joined Forum: 06/23/2004
|
Originally posted by: tpapablo
I use name calling in trials, though very subtly. But I primarily win by making logical and persuasive arguments, like I do on this forum.
The only people who read this forum that believe that is you and FK.
Any other verified real people want to show some support to Tpab's latest brilliant post?
Edited: 06/09/2014 at 11:29 AM by surf4fun
|
|
|