![]() |
2nd Light Forums | ![]() |
Topic Title: Do Masks Work? A review of the evidence.... Topic Summary: Created On: 12/03/2021 11:02 AM |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
![]() |
![]() |
- Fish Killer | - 12/03/2021 11:02 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Cole | - 12/03/2021 02:00 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Cole | - 12/03/2021 02:03 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Cole | - 12/03/2021 02:04 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- dingpatch | - 12/03/2021 02:31 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- nukeh2o | - 12/03/2021 03:07 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- follydude | - 12/03/2021 03:27 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Fish Killer | - 12/03/2021 03:58 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- tom | - 12/03/2021 04:06 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Cole | - 12/04/2021 06:00 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Fish Killer | - 12/04/2021 06:48 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Greensleeves | - 12/05/2021 12:57 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Fish Killer | - 12/05/2021 04:15 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Cole | - 12/05/2021 04:31 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Fish Killer | - 12/05/2021 10:44 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Greensleeves | - 12/05/2021 05:10 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Greensleeves | - 12/06/2021 01:42 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Fish Killer | - 12/06/2021 04:46 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Greensleeves | - 12/06/2021 05:11 AM |
![]() |
![]() |
- Fish Killer | - 12/06/2021 06:54 AM |
![]()
|
![]() |
|
It looks like the Missouri Department of Health made some solid findings that masks work.
So substantial that the Dotard Governor decided to quash the findings and keep them secret. If something works and helps the public and saves lives & expense, then why hide the results of the findings? Well, the short answer is that it doesn't fit with the Dotard narrative. Public health compromised. More Dotardism. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
It looks like the Missouri Department of Health made some solid findings that masks work. So substantial that the Dotard Governor decided to quash the findings and keep them secret. If something works and helps the public and saves lives & expense, then why hide the results of the findings? Well, the short answer is that it doesn't fit with the Dotard narrative. Public health compromised. More Dotardism. I can see that peer reviewed means shit to you! MORON! "In sum, of the 14 RCTs that have tested the effectiveness of masks in preventing the transmission of respiratory viruses, three suggest, but do not provide any statistically significant evidence in intention-to-treat analysis, that masks might be useful. The other eleven suggest that masks are either useless - whether compared with no masks or because they appear not to add to good hand hygiene alone - or actually counterproductive. Of the three studies that provided statistically significant evidence in intention-to-treat analysis that was not contradicted within the same study, one found that the combination of surgical masks and hand hygiene was less effective than hand hygiene alone, one found that the combination of surgical masks and hand hygiene was less effective than nothing, and one found that cloth masks were less effective than surgical masks." ------------------------- The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED. -BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is. -They are both card carrying narcissists. ^These are PROVED facts. Edited: 12/03/2021 at 04:00 PM by Fish Killer |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Wouldn't know peer review from short tacking the pier...
![]() ------------------------- add a signature since I'm here in profile anyway |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
http://med.stanford.edu/news/a...al-masks-covid-19.html BULLSHIT...COLESLAW! "In truth, the CDC's, U.K.'s, and WHO's earlier guidance was much more consistent with the best medical research on masks' effectiveness in preventing the spread of viruses. That research suggests that Americans' many months of mask-wearing has likely provided little to no health benefit and might even have been counterproductive in preventing the spread of the novel coronavirus. It's striking how much the CDC, in marshalling evidence to justify its revised mask guidance, studiously avoids mentioning randomized controlled trials. RCTs are uniformly regarded as the gold standard in medical research, yet the CDC basically ignores them apart from disparaging certain ones that particularly contradict the agency's position. In a "Science Brief" highlighting studies that "demonstrate that mask wearing reduces new infections" and serving as the main public justification for its mask guidance, the CDC provides a helpful matrix of 15 studies - none RCTs. The CDC instead focuses strictly on observational studies completed after Covid-19 began. In general, observational studies are not only of lower quality than RCTs but also are more likely to be politicized, as they can inject the researcher's judgment more prominently into the inquiry and lend themselves, far more than RCTs, to finding what one wants to find." ALL OF WHAT I POSTED....EVERY STUDY...IS AN RCT! ALL FUCKING 14 OF THEM! SO FUCK OFF COLESLAW! ------------------------- The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED. -BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is. -They are both card carrying narcissists. ^These are PROVED facts. |
|
|
|
FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2024 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.
First there was Air Jordan .