of course he stepped right in the dogshit.

Did we expect anything less?

These guys are about as covert as Tpap's male insecurities


US sought to lure Nicolás Maduro's pilot into betraying the Venezuelan leader



MIAMI (AP) - The federal agent had a daring pitch for Nicolás Maduro's chief pilot: All he had to do was surreptitiously divert the Venezuelan president's plane to a place where U.S. authorities could nab the strongman.

In exchange, the agent told the pilot in a clandestine meeting, the aviator would be made a very rich man.


-------------------------


We have certain things in common Jeffrey..


Edited: 10/30/2025 at 02:16 PM by fishkller

It sounds like a mini series on the USA network. This is by far the most incompetent administration ever.



-------------------------
I was right.

Edited: 10/31/2025 at 06:28 AM by Cole

I thought it was funny that Trump announced "covert" operations against Venezuela. It's a real shame those bone spurs kept him from serving. He might have learned that announcing "covert" operations is bad wrong.

-------------------------

"One of the reasons why propaganda tries to get you to hate government is because it's the one existing institution in which people can participate to some extent and constrain tyrannical unaccountable power." Noam Chomsky.

Once he announced we are doing covert actions, it is no longer covert. It may be classified, but it isn't covert.

Good thing Trump is smarter than his generals, despite being handicapped by bone spurs.

-------------------------
If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph: THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD WAS MUSIC - KV

Like TOP SECRET document sitting in the shitter at Moron-Lardo.

-------------------------
It was fun while it lasted.

They probably got the whole false flag operation before it happened on a signal chat.

-------------------------

"One of the reasons why propaganda tries to get you to hate government is because it's the one existing institution in which people can participate to some extent and constrain tyrannical unaccountable power." Noam Chomsky.

http://www.politico.com/news/m...aw-interview-00632077

It's long read but great hostorical perspective of international with an excellent analysis of current events.
>>....The administration has made a determination, the president has made a determination: Essentially, the United States is at war with various drug cartels. And because it is at war, the laws of war and armed conflict apply - and it is therefore entitled to exercise the right of self-defense, to take the ultimate step of eliminating this threat by using military force. That's the argument.
To assess that claim, you have to start by going back to the basics. And the basics are the United Nations Charter, which, of course, the United States led the world in drafting. The United Nations Charter makes it clear - Article 2, paragraph 4, famously - states that members of the UN shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the UN.

Now there's a carve-out. There's an exception, a sensible exception, in Article 51: "Nothing in the present charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense..." - and then the keywords - "...if an armed attack occurs."
That line has really dominated global thinking for 80 years, and there's never really been any departure from that principle: You can use self-defense if an armed attack occurs, or imminently about to occur.
And so, the question becomes, in relation to these allegations of drug cartels and narco-trafficking: Can this be said to amount to an armed attack? Frankly, it's very difficult to see how that argument can be made.

It's not only that, but once you start saying that entities which basically exist not to destroy the United States, but to make money from the people in the United States - that's essentially what they're motivated by - if you start saying that people are combatants, that they are the enemy, that they are warriors who can be destroyed by the use of force, why can't others make the same argument in relation to other categories of people....<<

-------------------------

"One of the reasons why propaganda tries to get you to hate government is because it's the one existing institution in which people can participate to some extent and constrain tyrannical unaccountable power." Noam Chomsky.