Hey Matt B ... How the hell o are you ??? :)

2nd Light Forums
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: "I think I'd take it"
Topic Summary:
Created On: 06/12/2019 03:55 PM
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
 "I think I'd take it"   - 3rdworldlover - 06/12/2019 03:55 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - fishkller - 06/12/2019 05:09 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - RustyTruck - 06/12/2019 08:10 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Bamboo - 06/13/2019 01:54 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - KeyserSoze - 06/13/2019 03:20 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - KeyserSoze - 06/13/2019 03:35 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - SlimyBritches - 06/13/2019 05:16 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/13/2019 05:29 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/13/2019 05:32 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - johnnyboy - 06/13/2019 05:47 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - RustyTruck - 06/13/2019 05:51 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - theglide - 06/13/2019 06:00 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/13/2019 06:04 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - KeyserSoze - 06/13/2019 06:12 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/13/2019 06:23 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - RiddleMe - 06/13/2019 06:30 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/13/2019 06:32 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 06:37 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Greensleeves - 06/13/2019 06:45 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 06:51 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/17/2019 10:28 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - 3rdworldlover - 06/13/2019 06:59 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 07:23 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Greensleeves - 06/13/2019 07:38 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - RustyTruck - 06/13/2019 07:50 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 07:52 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Greensleeves - 06/13/2019 08:01 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - 3rdworldlover - 06/13/2019 08:04 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Pagerow - 06/13/2019 10:47 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 10:49 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 08:11 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 08:20 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - scombrid - 06/13/2019 09:41 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 10:30 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 10:37 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 10:49 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 10:55 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 11:10 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 11:10 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 11:12 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 11:28 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 11:34 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 12:05 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - johnnyboy - 06/13/2019 12:16 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - jdbman - 06/13/2019 12:55 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Pagerow - 06/13/2019 01:37 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Pagerow - 06/13/2019 01:37 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 02:42 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 03:29 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 03:32 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 03:43 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - wtf - 06/13/2019 04:42 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/14/2019 06:36 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/14/2019 07:30 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/13/2019 02:19 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/13/2019 02:41 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - SlimyBritches - 06/17/2019 10:16 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/13/2019 02:44 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - wtf - 06/13/2019 04:43 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - wtf - 06/13/2019 04:48 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 05:33 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - wtf - 06/14/2019 08:54 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/16/2019 01:27 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/17/2019 05:52 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/17/2019 06:58 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/17/2019 07:46 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/17/2019 07:46 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - tpapablo - 06/17/2019 08:30 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - gdudewe - 06/17/2019 08:42 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/17/2019 10:16 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/17/2019 10:21 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - jdbman - 06/13/2019 07:38 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - 3rdworldlover - 06/13/2019 07:44 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - SlimyBritches - 06/13/2019 11:06 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - wtf - 06/13/2019 11:08 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 11:09 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - gdudewe - 06/14/2019 03:30 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - cheaterfiveo - 06/18/2019 03:40 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/18/2019 03:53 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/18/2019 03:57 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/18/2019 09:58 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Fish Killer - 06/19/2019 03:31 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/19/2019 07:51 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Fish Killer - 06/19/2019 11:11 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/19/2019 12:33 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Fish Killer - 06/19/2019 12:46 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/19/2019 12:57 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - johnnyboy - 06/19/2019 05:28 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Fish Killer - 06/19/2019 07:01 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/19/2019 07:03 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - all3 - 06/19/2019 07:04 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Fish Killer - 06/19/2019 07:21 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - RustyTruck - 06/19/2019 10:21 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Fish Killer - 06/20/2019 02:17 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - gdudewe - 06/20/2019 03:37 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Cole - 06/20/2019 04:39 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - johnnyboy - 06/20/2019 07:08 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - Fish Killer - 06/20/2019 01:15 PM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - HAPDigital - 06/13/2019 05:59 AM  
 "I think I'd take it"   - scombrid - 06/13/2019 07:48 AM  
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 06/13/2019 07:38 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Greensleeves

Posts: 20478
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.

"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"

His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)
 06/13/2019 07:50 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


RustyTruck

Posts: 33298
Joined Forum: 08/02/2004

Originally posted by: Greensleeves

tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.



"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"



His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)


His periods of lucidity are getting more infrequent I'm afraid. It's a shame, the guy does have a decent sense of humor.

-------------------------
Capitalism is based on the ridiculous notion that you can enjoy limitless growth in a closed, finite system.

In biology, such behavior of cells is called "cancer".
 06/13/2019 07:52 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: Greensleeves

tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.



"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"



His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)


The problem is she didn't do it. Researching is different than being approached by foreign agents and taking what they have. I thought you were a lawyer Tpap. Oh yeah, that is BS.
 06/13/2019 08:01 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Greensleeves

Posts: 20478
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Agreed Hap but for the sake of brevity I didn't go into "and they use the filth from their GOP misinformation masters to argue which are lies/misdirections in the first place"
 06/13/2019 08:04 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


3rdworldlover

Posts: 22493
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

David Frum,

"As the president plunges into a sea of what-aboutism, pulling Fox News talking heads after him, let's recall what it is actually about a crime was committed, a very serious crime: a computer hack. It's no less a burglary for stealing digital rather than physical property. Same crime as Watergate. (2)
All the way back in the summer of 2016, everybody knew who committed this crime: Russian military intelligence. Claims that maybe it was an "inside job" etc. were floated in bad faith by untruthful people - but everybody knew, the Trump campaign very much included. (3)
When Donald Trump Jr. accepted his famous Trump Tower meeting, he was hoping to receive the proceeds of a crime. He was disappointed in that hope, but that's what he hoped. (4)
And when the proceeds of the crime did begin to be posted on the WikiLeaks site later in the summer of 2016 and -devastatingly - less than 1 hour after the reporting of the "Access Hollywood" tape in October 2016, everybody understand that this was Putin acting to help Trump (5)
None of this bears any resemblance to "oppo research" - information obtained lawfully by asking questions, reading archives, etc. It was crime, no less criminal for being outsourced to foreigners beyond the reach of US prosectors (6)
The Mueller report found insufficient evidence to convict anyone on the Trump campaign of culpability in the crime. But it stressed: the crime was committed by Russian military intelligence to help Trump, and the Trump campaign knowingly welcomed that help (7)
If the Trump campaign had flown a private investigator to Moscow to interview people about the (bogus) Uranium One Clinton story ... nobody would object. That is oppo research. If they trawled old Arkansas police records in search of something discrediting ... again, research (8)
What fellow Republicans first and then Democrats later hired Christopher Steele to do - interview people, collect rumors, sift through them - falls into this former category. The quality of Steele's work you can dispute. He committed no crimes in course of doing it. (9)
Trump Jr's visitors in June 2016 purported to deliver - and Trump's actual helpers later in the year did actually deliver - the proceeds of crimes. In full light of day, and with Trump on video urging them onward. (10)
The Trump campaign was absolved of criminal culpability by Mueller in large part on issue o intent. Did they truly understand they were being invited to participate in a crime? Did they truly wish to participate? And could that be proven beyond reasonable doubt? (11)
That's why President Trump's words to ABC were so important. He was asked, now that you have full knowledge of all that was at issue - including the crime committed by the Putin regime by hacking Americans - would you receive that information again? Trump answered YES. (12)
Trump confessed the thing Mueller could not prove. (END
 06/13/2019 10:47 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Pagerow

Posts: 5609
Joined Forum: 12/22/2005

Originally posted by: 3rdworldlover


That's why President Trump's words to ABC were so important. He was asked, "Now that you have full knowledge of all that was at issue, including the crime committed by the Putin regime by hacking Americans, would you receive that information again? Trump answered "YES." (12)

Trump confessed the thing Mueller could not prove.


^^Exactly!!^^

Ya'll Drumpf-ists keep following this blundering D-bag, and you are showing what lemmings you really are.

-------------------------
GOP:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project
 06/13/2019 10:49 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: Pagerow

Originally posted by: 3rdworldlover





That's why President Trump's words to ABC were so important. He was asked, "Now that you have full knowledge of all that was at issue, including the crime committed by the Putin regime by hacking Americans, would you receive that information again? Trump answered "YES." (12)



Trump confessed the thing Mueller could not prove.




^^Exactly!!^^



Ya'll Drumpf-ists keep following this blundering D-bag, and you are showing what lemmings you really are.


They like it because "it makes progs angry". It's all they got. They contribute absolutely nothing to our country, nothing. They're just trolls and they love a big orange troll in the White House.
 06/13/2019 08:11 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: HAPDigital
Originally posted by: Greensleeves tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing. "Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it" His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)
The problem is she didn't do it. Researching is different than being approached by foreign agents and taking what they have. I thought you were a lawyer Tpap. Oh yeah, that is BS.
Agreed Hap but for the sake of brevity I didn't go into "and they use the filth from their GOP misinformation masters to argue which are lies/misdirections in the first place"
Ah. So it is wrong if someone comes to you, but perfectly fine if you go to them? So you guys would be cool with Trump going to Putin and asking him to provide any dirt that he has on Biden? Like I said, you guys are making fools out of yourselves, again.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 08:20 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: Greensleeves



tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.







"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"







His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)




The problem is she didn't do it. Researching is different than being approached by foreign agents and taking what they have. I thought you were a lawyer Tpap. Oh yeah, that is BS.


Agreed Hap but for the sake of brevity I didn't go into "and they use the filth from their GOP misinformation masters to argue which are lies/misdirections in the first place"


Ah. So it is wrong if someone comes to you, but perfectly fine if you go to them? So you guys would be cool with Trump going to Putin and asking him to provide any dirt that he has on Biden? Like I said, you guys are making fools out of yourselves, again.


Hillary never went to a foreign agency for dirt. You still don't have your facts straight. A big part of the problem is that Trump supporters are ill-informed.

Edited: 06/13/2019 at 08:25 AM by HAPDigital
 06/13/2019 09:41 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


scombrid

Posts: 18019
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.

-------------------------
...

 06/13/2019 10:30 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: scombrid Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.
Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 10:37 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: scombrid

Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.


Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.


So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.
 06/13/2019 10:49 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: HAPDigital
Originally posted by: tpapablo
Originally posted by: scombrid Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.
Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.
So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.
Nooo. That breaks no law and doesn't even come close. You, Hap, better stick to being a bum. You don't have much of a future in the law business.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 10:55 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: tpapablo



Originally posted by: scombrid



Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.




Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.




So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.



Nooo. That breaks no law and doesn't even come close. You, Hap, better stick to being a bum. You don't have much of a future in the law business.


Eh yes it does. I have more of a chance at law than you, I am sure....

52 U.S. Code ยง 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

Get back at me when you get something right for once. You are batting a big goose egg.

I suggest you stick to living off your parents' money.

Edited: 06/13/2019 at 10:58 AM by HAPDigital
 06/13/2019 11:10 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: HAPDigital
Originally posted by: tpapablo
Originally posted by: HAPDigital
Originally posted by: tpapablo
Originally posted by: scombrid Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.
Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.
So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.
Nooo. That breaks no law and doesn't even come close. You, Hap, better stick to being a bum. You don't have much of a future in the law business.
Eh yes it does. I have more of a chance at law than you, I am sure.... 52 U.S. Code ยง 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
You just proved that you do not. I will mention this, for us litigators, having some knucklehead thinking he knows the law usually results in a bonanza for us. It takes a lot of time and money to untangle those kinds of messes.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 11:10 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: tpapablo



Originally posted by: HAPDigital



Originally posted by: tpapablo







Originally posted by: scombrid







Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.








Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.








So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.






Nooo. That breaks no law and doesn't even come close. You, Hap, better stick to being a bum. You don't have much of a future in the law business.




Eh yes it does. I have more of a chance at law than you, I am sure....



52 U.S. Code ยง 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals


You just proved that you do not. I will mention this, for us litigators, having some knucklehead thinking he knows the law usually results in a bonanza for us. It takes a lot of time and money to untangle those kinds of messes.


No, I proved you were wrong.
 06/13/2019 11:12 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Tpap's 'litigation skills'....

 06/13/2019 11:28 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Well, Hillary is in deep trouble then. Wonder why they haven't prosecuted her. Maybe you, with your brilliant legal skills, should call some U.S. attorneys and set them straight. Would you do us all a favor and record that conversation and post it here when you are done.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 11:34 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Well, Hillary is in deep trouble then. Wonder why they haven't prosecuted her. Maybe you, with your brilliant legal skills, should call some U.S. attorneys and set them straight. Would you do us all a favor and record that conversation and post it here when you are done.


FYI Hillary hired a US based firm that was originally hired by the GOP. Never had anyone from a foreign country offer her anything. I proved you were wrong. For a "lawyer" you sure do post a lot of hyperbole and speculation but zero facts. What gives, tflappy?
 06/13/2019 12:05 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

There know point in arguing with you about this. You are wrong again.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 12:16 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


johnnyboy

Posts: 25071
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Hap cited the law and applied the facts. You argued he was wrong without law or precedent as your basis. In short, you got outlawyered.

-------------------------

"One of the reasons why propaganda tries to get you to hate government is because it's the one existing institution in which people can participate to some extent and constrain tyrannical unaccountable power." Noam Chomsky.

 06/13/2019 12:55 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


jdbman

Posts: 12159
Joined Forum: 07/28/2003

I proved you were wrong
HapD

Congrats, but not needed as the tampon proves himself wrong daily.

Nice fish gif.

-------------------------
So if you are a surfer I wish you the prosperity that allows you more time to pursue the salt water dream, and the true happiness that comes from warm water, clean waves and the companionship of your fellow surfers. If you are an internet troll just spewing bs then f off.
 06/13/2019 01:37 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Pagerow

Posts: 5609
Joined Forum: 12/22/2005

Faux "news" goes nuts over Drumpf admission

Fox News Hosts & Rick Santorum Lose It Over Trump "Opposition Dirt" Admission

Fellow primetime Fox News host Laura Ingraham demanded to know who in the Trump administration had approved the interview. Trump being "put in that situation is beyond me," she said

They can't protect him from himself!

-------------------------
GOP:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project
 06/13/2019 01:37 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Pagerow

Posts: 5609
Joined Forum: 12/22/2005

double post

-------------------------
GOP:

Gaslight
Obstruct
Project

Edited: 06/14/2019 at 12:26 PM by Pagerow
 06/13/2019 02:42 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: johnnyboy

Hap cited the law and applied the facts. You argued he was wrong without law or precedent as your basis. In short, you got outlawyered.


I Ally McBeal'ed his ass.
 06/13/2019 03:29 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: HAPDigital
Originally posted by: johnnyboy Hap cited the law and applied the facts. You argued he was wrong without law or precedent as your basis. In short, you got outlawyered.
I Ally McBeal'ed his ass.
Ok, I'll bite. (a) Prohibition It shall be unlawful for - (1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make - (A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election; (B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or (C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or (2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national. (a)(1) doesn't apply to me because I am not a foreign national. (a)(2) doesn't apply because I am not acting in connection with an election or a political party, etc.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/13/2019 03:32 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: johnnyboy



Hap cited the law and applied the facts. You argued he was wrong without law or precedent as your basis. In short, you got outlawyered.




I Ally McBeal'ed his ass.


Ok, I'll bite.

(a) Prohibition It shall be unlawful for -
(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make -
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or
(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.


(a)(1) doesn't apply to me because I am not a foreign national. (a)(2) doesn't apply because I am not acting in connection with an election or a political party, etc.


Oh I see, you want us to believe what you said was about you the civilian, not someone running for government office. LOL Nice try. You were found to be wrong. You should now try to prove that what you said was not about people running for office or members of their campaign. Or just give up like you should for your own sake.



Edited: 06/13/2019 at 03:41 PM by HAPDigital
 06/13/2019 03:43 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

I'm convinced this dude Tpap is the biggest clown on 2ndlight.
 06/13/2019 04:42 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


wtf

Posts: 6945
Joined Forum: 11/23/2005

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

I'm convinced this dude Tpap is the biggest clown on 2ndlight.

Nah, 2nd biggest but quickly closing in on FK


-------------------------
QOP = Terrorists
FK = Gay
 06/14/2019 06:36 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: HAPDigital I'm convinced this dude Tpap is the biggest clown on 2ndlight.
Hahahaha. Got you again. Some people never learn. Any other dummies want to take me on?

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/14/2019 07:30 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

I'm convinced this dude Tpap is the biggest clown on 2ndlight.


Hahahaha. Got you again. Some people never learn. Any other dummies want to take me on?


Yeah, you showed me....

 06/13/2019 02:19 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68176
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: tpapablo



Originally posted by: HAPDigital



Originally posted by: tpapablo







Originally posted by: scombrid







Here's the big question. He didn't make this statement for shits and giggles. What is about to drop? He's trying to get ahead of something.








Doubt it. Just being honest in all likelihood. Most politicians would say "no," but they would. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else. If some Chinese guy came up to me and said that he had some dirt on Biden, do I want to know it, I'd say yes. So would most everyone.








So you admit you would break the law. What a scumbag.






Nooo. That breaks no law and doesn't even come close. You, Hap, better stick to being a bum. You don't have much of a future in the law business.




Eh yes it does. I have more of a chance at law than you, I am sure....



52 U.S. Code ยง 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals


You just proved that you do not. I will mention this, for us litigators, having some knucklehead thinking he knows the law usually results in a bonanza for us. It takes a lot of time and money to untangle those kinds of messes.


Um, you just said nothing. Yes, nice words and all, but you said nothing.



-------------------------
I was right.
 06/13/2019 02:41 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Don't need to say anything. I am right.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/17/2019 10:16 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


SlimyBritches

Posts: 6461
Joined Forum: 01/08/2016

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Don't need to say anything. I am right.


That's the only way you'll ever be right. By not saying a thing.
 06/13/2019 02:44 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


all3

Posts: 2488
Joined Forum: 12/28/2011

Now trump is just saying that it is fake news, he never said that, it was falsely edited. Unfortunately he didn't get the memo out to his propagandists and repug defenders, they're still trying to explain why it's ok and whatabout Hillary !

-------------------------
"I remember South Africa in the late 70's, sleeping on the beach at J-bay, smoking ganja with the blacks. On weekends we'd go to the pub in East London to drink beer and fight with the Afrikaners. They liked to fight, I liked to fight. It was a good time"
 06/13/2019 04:43 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


wtf

Posts: 6945
Joined Forum: 11/23/2005

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: tpapablo



Originally posted by: HAPDigital



Originally posted by: Greensleeves







tspank believes deflection is a valid form of discourse anymore. He's devolved into the run of the mill GOP tool being spoon fed from the porta potty that is the right wing.















"Hey Hillary did it so it's OK for Trump to do it"















His self respect comes from bottles (prescription and sauce)








The problem is she didn't do it. Researching is different than being approached by foreign agents and taking what they have. I thought you were a lawyer Tpap. Oh yeah, that is BS.




Agreed Hap but for the sake of brevity I didn't go into "and they use the filth from their GOP misinformation masters to argue which are lies/misdirections in the first place"




Ah. So it is wrong if someone comes to you, but perfectly fine if you go to them? So you guys would be cool with Trump going to Putin and asking him to provide any dirt that he has on Biden? Like I said, you guys are making fools out of yourselves, again.




Hillary never went to a foreign agency for dirt. You still don't have your facts straight. A big part of the problem is that Trump supporters are ill-informed.

Why yes, that is why I call them 'dotards'


-------------------------
QOP = Terrorists
FK = Gay
 06/13/2019 04:48 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


wtf

Posts: 6945
Joined Forum: 11/23/2005

Man, sorry for the 3rd post, but I am just LMFAO at the way you owned tpap HAP - good work!

-------------------------
QOP = Terrorists
FK = Gay
 06/13/2019 05:33 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


HAPDigital

Posts: 16855
Joined Forum: 11/29/2004

Originally posted by: wtf

Man, sorry for the 3rd post, but I am just LMFAO at the way you owned tpap HAP - good work!


I'm convinced he is an act.
 06/14/2019 08:54 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


wtf

Posts: 6945
Joined Forum: 11/23/2005

Originally posted by: HAPDigital

Originally posted by: wtf



Man, sorry for the 3rd post, but I am just LMFAO at the way you owned tpap HAP - good work!




I'm convinced he is an act.

100% agreed. There is now way he believes even half of what he posts. It's clearly just to get a rise.

-------------------------
QOP = Terrorists
FK = Gay
 06/16/2019 01:27 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


all3

Posts: 2488
Joined Forum: 12/28/2011

What say ye trumpists? Is it OK to get help from a foreign country for a U.S. election? Should we change the law and just let them donate directly to a campaign ?

-------------------------
"I remember South Africa in the late 70's, sleeping on the beach at J-bay, smoking ganja with the blacks. On weekends we'd go to the pub in East London to drink beer and fight with the Afrikaners. They liked to fight, I liked to fight. It was a good time"
 06/17/2019 05:52 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68176
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Originally posted by: all3

What say ye trumpists? Is it OK to get help from a foreign country for a U.S. election? Should we change the law and just let them donate directly to a campaign ?


Yep, a legitimate question. Do you agree with the president? Should we allow foreign governments into the US electoral system?



-------------------------
I was right.
 06/17/2019 06:58 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Umm, this is over. Time for you guys to move on to your next bout of outrage, vapors and hypocrisy..

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/17/2019 07:46 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68176
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Do you agree with him?

Wait, never mind, of course you do.

-------------------------
I was right.
 06/17/2019 07:46 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68176
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

You claim to be a lawyer, is it legal to take money and information from another country for an election?

-------------------------
I was right.
 06/17/2019 08:30 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43826
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Originally posted by: Cole You claim to be a lawyer, is it legal to take money and information from another country for an election?
Sorry, I am gearing up for the next dem outrage at our president. I am moving on.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 06/17/2019 08:42 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


gdudewe

Posts: 4480
Joined Forum: 11/09/2011

Originally posted by: tpapablo

Originally posted by: Cole

You claim to be a lawyer, is it legal to take money and information from another country for an election?


Sorry, I am gearing up for the next dem outrage at our president. I am moving on.


Are you fucking kidding me. The so called right wingers did and are still doing shit flips over Obama, You stupid shits flipped out because he order French mustard, wore a tan suit, played golf (way less than the cheating Cheeto)This could fill pages. So, shut the fuck up about what we complain about. You have it coming, and the imbecile you put in office has earned every bit of scrutiny he gets. He loves it! He will get caught in all of his lies.

-------------------------
I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do, because I noticed it always coincides with their own desires

Susan B. Anthony
1896

Impeach Trump
 06/17/2019 10:16 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


all3

Posts: 2488
Joined Forum: 12/28/2011

Originally posted by: tpapablo
Originally posted by: Cole You claim to be a lawyer, is it legal to take money and information from another country for an election?
Sorry, I am gearing up for the next dem outrage at our president. I am moving on.
It would be easier to type yes or no. But I realize it's hard to admit you're wrong. Or that trump is wrong.

-------------------------
"I remember South Africa in the late 70's, sleeping on the beach at J-bay, smoking ganja with the blacks. On weekends we'd go to the pub in East London to drink beer and fight with the Afrikaners. They liked to fight, I liked to fight. It was a good time"
 06/17/2019 10:21 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Cole

Posts: 68176
Joined Forum: 07/22/2003

Is it a personality disorder, retardation or mental illness?

Trump truly has reached a God level among his devout.

-------------------------
I was right.
Statistics
146494 users are registered to the 2nd Light Forums forum.
There are currently 0 users logged in to the forum.

FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2024 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

First there was Air Jordan .