Hey Matt B ... How the hell o are you ??? :)

2nd Light Forums
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Extensive Two-Year Study Pokes All Kinds of Holes in N95 Masks - Biden, Fauci Hardest Hit
Topic Summary:
Created On: 12/02/2022 01:27 PM
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 12/02/2022 01:27 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Extensive Two-Year Study Pokes All Kinds of Holes in N95 Masks - Biden, Fauci Hardest Hit
By Mike Miller | 3:30 PM on December 02, 2022

And there it is. Again.

After the CDC took nearly two years to tell America and presumably the world that cloth masks were virtually worthless for mitigating the spread of COVID-19 and that N95 masks provide "the highest" level of protection, a new peer-reviewed, international randomized controlled trial (RCT) has found no statistically significant real-world evidence that masks stop aerosolized transmission of the virus.

In my not-so-humble opinion - an opinion many of us have shared for nearly two years - masks are largely virtue-signaling symbols worn by liberals, or others frightened into believing that masks are effective in preventing one from contracting the virus. Incidentally, if they did? Why did liberals' hair catch on fire if they were wearing a mask and you weren't? Rhetorical question, of course.

Here's more, via Just the News:

Published in the Annals of Internal Medicine (AIM) this week and led by researchers at Canada's McMaster University, the study found no statistically significant difference in protection between the two kinds of masks in healthcare facilities in Canada, Israel, Pakistan and Egypt.

Funders included the Canadian government and World Health Organization, which unlike the U.S. opposes masking young children and also found "no evidence" face coverings made a difference against influenza in a 2019 study.

Previous RCTs in the COVID era have found mediocre protection from face coverings at best. A Danish study of 6,000 that had trouble getting published - and eventually landed in AIM - found no statistically significant difference between surgical and no-mask wearers.

A much larger study led by Yale University found that "Based on the 95 percent confidence intervals, we do not even know if surgical mask efficacy is more than 0 percent."

As I mockingly suggested in the headline, Joe "Winter of Severe Illness and Death" Biden and Anthony Fauci, hilariously dubbed "the quadruple-vaxed, double-masked oracle of nonsense," by my colleague Jim Thompson, were no doubt hardest hit by the news.

Speaking of Fauci, as noted by JTN, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt recently claimed that the retiring National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director, "whose flip-flops on masking led to mass public confusion early in the pandemic, couldn't name any studies showing mask effectiveness in his recent deposition in state-led litigation against alleged federal censorship."

Another tidbit from Fauci depo: In Feb '20 he emailed a friend advising her masks were ineffective. Confirmed again on Mar 31. On Apr 3 he's adamant masks should be worn even though he couldn't cite a single study to prove it. Mandates followed - Lives ruined

COVID tyranny is born

Bingo.


As the walls continue to close in on Fauci, with new studies emerging and the GOP set to regain control of the House in January, the good doctor seems to have quickly developed a serious case of amnesia, as my colleague Susie Moore reported on November 27 in reference to the Missouri (and Louisiana) deposition.

Although he'll soon be retiring from his role as NAIAD Director and chief medical adviser to President Biden, Dr. Anthony Fauci, is still working overtime to spin the COVID-19 narrative. While he apparently feigned ignorance (or lack of recall) during his recent deposition in the lawsuit brought by the States of Louisiana and Missouri.

Louisiana Attorney General tweeted:

Wow! It was amazing to spend 7 hours with Dr. Fauci. The man who single-handedly wrecked the U.S. economy based upon "the science." Only to discover that he can't recall practically anything dealing with his Covid response!

Yup, totally amazing.


The Bottom Line

While in college, I was once walking down a hall in the Science building and came upon a glass aquarium in the wall, in which a white lab rat was nosing around, while a large snake lay motionless. All of a sudden, the rat had an "aw, s**t moment and stopped dead in its tracks. The snake hadn't moved a muscle. A split second later, the snake, at lightning speed, raced across the aquarium and grabbed the poor rat. The jig was up.

Anthony Fauci is beginning to realize he's that lab rat.

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.
 12/02/2022 02:47 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tpapablo

Posts: 43831
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Read about that study a few days ago. I don't bother posting such things anymore because the normal people on this forum already know that masks were a hoax and progs will never get it through their thick skulls that they are. And, for several reasons, we should not want progs to give up their cult-like belief in masks. First, they are useful for identifying progs in that only progs could be so stupid as to believe they work and wear them. That allows the rest of us to avoid the scum. Second, progs tend to be freakish looking and it creeps me out to see their full faces. Masks help with that. Third, if a truly deadly virus does come along one day, those flaming idiots will be out in their masks thinking that they will protect them. I certainly won't shed any tears if they get wiped out en masse. In fact, I think that would be great.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q
 12/02/2022 07:14 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tom

Posts: 8013
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

Hmmm. https://brighterworld.mcmaster...routine-covid-19-care/

-------------------------
add a signature since I'm here in profile anyway
 12/03/2022 02:59 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005



"Based on the 95 percent confidence intervals, we do not even know if surgical mask efficacy is more than 0 percent."

Lmao



-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.
 12/03/2022 03:18 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


tom

Posts: 8013
Joined Forum: 07/25/2003

This Yale? https://insights.som.yale.edu/...ce-covid-19-infections

-------------------------
add a signature since I'm here in profile anyway
 12/03/2022 04:16 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

Originally posted by: tom

This Yale? https://insights.som.yale.edu/...ce-covid-19-infections


Bwahahahahah.......thats not scientific AT ALL!

LMAO!

FOOL!

"In the first part of the study, completed this spring, the researchers found that a "cocktail" of four interventions, including endorsements from community leaders and reminders from roving monitors, increased mask wearing to 42% in the targeted villages, up from 13% in control villages, as recorded by an observation team. That study's recommendations have now reached more than 100 million people, having been adopted by governments across South Asia and drawn the support of major companies and NGOs."

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Edited: 12/03/2022 at 04:17 AM by Fish Killer
 12/03/2022 05:19 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


dingpatch

Posts: 19032
Joined Forum: 07/24/2003

Well, regardless, , , , , , we all must agree that the fact is that the "virus" is a lot smaller than the the "filter" of the N95 and, as such, will easily pass through the mask.

BUT, the other fact is that most of the "airborne" virus is actually attached/stuck to other "particles" in the air and, as such, the N95 captures the particles. Let's say that the "virus" by itself is as small as a pea, while the "particle" the virus is on is the size of a walnut. Get it?

-------------------------
Dora Hates You
 12/03/2022 07:25 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Fish Killer

Posts: 71439
Joined Forum: 10/09/2005

^Load of grade A 100% BULLSHIT!

"Infectious aerosols are suspensions of pathogens in particles in the air, subject to both physical and biological laws. Particle size is the most important determinant of aerosol behaviour. Particles that are 5 um or smaller in size can remain airborne indefinitely under most indoor conditions16 unless there is removal due to air currents or dilution ventilation. This same size range of particles (ie, <5 um) deposits in the lower respiratory tract in humans12, 17 as well as in guinea pigs, mice, and monkeys.18 Particles sized 6 - 12 um deposit in the upper airways of the head and neck.18
Sophisticated imaging studies have shown that plumes of aerosols are generated by sneezing or coughing (appendix p 1).19, 20 The aerosol plume contains the highest concentration of particles, which then dissipate in the air over time and distance."

-------------------------
The REAL truth is....both of the forum idiots are OWNED.
-BOTH of them have no clue who their owner is.
-They are both card carrying narcissists.
^These are PROVED facts.

Edited: 12/03/2022 at 07:36 AM by Fish Killer
Statistics
146494 users are registered to the 2nd Light Forums forum.
There are currently 0 users logged in to the forum.

FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2024 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.

First there was Air Jordan .