Trump's call to remove judges from the bench came after his allies amplified attacks on U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, following an order the judge issued Saturday instructing the administration to turn around aircraft deporting alleged gang members to Venezuela. The planes continued to their destinations, but the administration has insisted it did not defy the judge's directive.

"This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges' I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!" Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Tuesday.

Now Chief Justice Roberts is starting to get the picture, albeit far too late to prevent Trump and Musk from stopping their all out assault on the rule of law, separation of powers, due process and impeachment process.

Trump and Musk have demanded that this "crooked Judge" be impeached. Musk's typical threat to primary a congress member is not going to work because federal judges are appointed for life. Roberts, who fed these dragons and gave Trump immunity, is now defending this Judge and all judges but its a bit late for this and it will have no effect.

-------------------------

"One of the reasons why propaganda tries to get you to hate government is because it's the one existing institution in which people can participate to some extent and constrain tyrannical unaccountable power." Noam Chomsky.

If the SCOTUS thinks they are safe, they are sadly mistaken. The only cure for this spreading disease is the impeachment of the Commander in Chief.

-------------------------
I was right.

Sounds like they are exercising free speech to me. But, then, progs are against that, aren't they? Truth be known, I have had some harsh words about some judges in my time. In any case, this idiotic decision will be appealed and overturned. The judge will not be impeached and everyone knows it.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

Tclown believe the same thing about

Project 2025

Grocery Prices

Ukraine War



...ssssssSteaks'd!




-------------------------


Art of The Dipshit

Sounds like the libtard "judges" are pro crime, illegal immigration, Hamas and other left causes, not pro-USA and the rule of law!

-------------------------
Romans 8;18-32 John 3;16-18; Ecl. 10-2 (Moderated)

They are prog idiots, so yes they are pro-crime, pro-terrorist. and pro immigration. They are tough on crime only when it involves conservative Americans.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

Pugs keep wiping their dirty bums with the Constitution while they whine about "law and order".



-------------------------
Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest.

Denis Diderot

How so? Can you give some examples?

You have no idea what you are talking about, now do you? lol


-------------------------
I was right.

That changed when progs called for the impeachment of conservative justices. I've often said, if you idiots do something, then so shall we. Reap the whirlwind, progs. Where were you then, Rusty?

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

Nah Tdork

it changed when Thomas and Alito sold out America by accepting bribes.

next...



-------------------------


Art of The Dipshit

Edited: 03/19/2025 at 06:10 PM by fishkller

Trumpolov is a Felon, felons don't like laws.

-------------------------
It was fun while it lasted.

They are taking bribes. Their decisions are tainted. If the ones Trump wants to impeach are taking bribes, I agree with him.



-------------------------
I was right.

t-poop-for-brains doesn't understand the difference between

Taking bribes (i.e. conflicts of interest) and Judicial decisions

Wrongz again!

-------------------------
You can't spell "HATRED" without

"RED HAT"

Sometines I think his "law degree" came out of a backcountry moonshine still

-------------------------


Art of The Dipshit

This is the part where Tpap, a lawyer, explains how our constitutional framework dictates how an appellate process works to question judges legal mistakes. Impeachment for decisions someone doesnt like would mean literally half of all decisions would subject the judge to an impeachment process requiring 2/3 of the senate, who is occasionally busy with running the country, depending on which party is in the majority. An appeal is made citing the mistake, the issue is briefed by both sides and the appellate court decides and writes their legal opinion. Of thst doesn't work, the case can be appealed to the Supreme Court, who has to accept the case from the thousands out there. It's a process centuries old and replicated in each state with state law.

This democratic, constitutional process was fine for centuries until Trump's DOJ lawyers defied a federal judge and the Court's order? Why? Good luck having Tpap explain this. But let's be clear, federal judges are appointed, or as the joke goes, anointed for life. They can only be removed with a 2/3 vote of the senate. Very rare. And remember, once Trump and his fellow dipshits target this judge and make these insulting directives and corruption allegations, that same judge will remain on their case. That judge will remember that. So will the all the other judges in the courthouse that think this move a threat to the process and their very comfortable jobs.

-------------------------

"One of the reasons why propaganda tries to get you to hate government is because it's the one existing institution in which people can participate to some extent and constrain tyrannical unaccountable power." Noam Chomsky.

Double

-------------------------

"One of the reasons why propaganda tries to get you to hate government is because it's the one existing institution in which people can participate to some extent and constrain tyrannical unaccountable power." Noam Chomsky.

Edited: 03/20/2025 at 05:13 PM by johnnyboy

Well said. The more enemies in high places Trump creates, the better, as far as I'm concerned.



-------------------------
I was right.

"No collision"
"No Project 2025"

No, I am not a prog and feel no compulsion to lie. Instead, I would tell the truth, which is that the appellate process is not mentioned in the Constitution, but impeachment is.

-------------------------
I :heart; Q

Are speed limit laws in the Constitution? How about bank robbery? Insider trading perhaps? Divorce law? No? So what's your point? Established law, is established law.



-------------------------
I was right.

Edited: 03/21/2025 at 07:18 AM by Cole