Originally posted by: Sniper
Originally posted by: HAPDigital
Originally posted by: Sniper
Originally posted by: RustyTruck
Originally posted by: Sniper
Originally posted by: HAPDigital
An "F'ING joke" is when you do not realize or care to realize that it is illegal to take hacked info gathered from Russian intelligence and use it to sway our election in the US. If team Trump conspired with Russian intelligence, which is what it is looking like especially with the Stone indictment, it is a big problem. I'm not sure why you have no problem with this. You're cool with it because Trump is your guy?
You realize that the crimes Roger Stone has been accused of all happened after the 2016 election was over, right?
"After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign."
The requests grew more specific and appeared targeted to reinforce campaign narratives, which were also being echoed by social media memes being pushed by Russian trolls. After WikiLeaks dropped another bombshell on October 7, an associate of a high-ranking Trump campaign official texted Stone saying, "Well done."
If Trump has been compromised by the Russians and he is a puppet of Putin, then why does he need to ask someone on his staff, to ask Roger Stone, to ask Wikileaks, to ask Russia, what information they had on Hillary and when it will be released? That doesn't make any sense.
On the other hand, you have Hillary, who funneled money through a law firm to pay Robert Steele, a British ex-spy who has been fired by the FBI for being an unreliable resource, to create the dossier. Althought it was unverified, it was pushed through the FISA courts to justify spying on members of the Trump campaign. THIS IS PROVEN.
Who cares if it was unverified and who cares who paid for it?
Ughhh, the FISA court should definitely care about both of these.
Did Clinton funnel money through a lawfirm to pay for the dossier? Yes.
Was the dossier used as justification for FISA warrants on members of the Trump campaign? Yes.
Was the FISA judge made aware of who paid for the dossier or that it was unverified? No.
Did FBI agents discuss internally that the dossier was unverified and that could present a problem? Yes.
Yet, you think no crimes were committed by anyone during any of this? I'll be very surprised if we have heard the last of this.
Your turn. You try to succuntly connect the dots of what you think happend with Trump colluding with Russa.
If any of this was a crime they'd have at it by now. It's clear you want a conspiracy somewhere that there is not one and you are bummed because they keep finding more info leading us to Trump/Russia instead of a crime you wish happened with the way they are going about it. I'm sorry bud, you're getting bad info. You're listening to opinions from right wing hacks that don't mean anything in reality. You're basically regurgitating fish's talking points which have no bearing on reality.
Topic Tools
01/28/2019 12:15 PM
